Measure Description | Source of measure | Caldwell, B., & Bradley, R. (1984). Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)-revised edition. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas, Little Rock. |
Mode of administration | Combination of naturalistic observation and interview with the parent. | |
Age range for use | Families with children from age 0-15. Multiple versions exist for different child age ranges: toddler (0-3), early childhood (3-6), middle childhood (6-10), and early adolescence (10-15). | |
Domains Assessed | The HOME is a descriptive profile that leads to an assessment of a child's home environment. It measures the amount and quality of support and stimulation available to the child at home. Specific domains assessed vary based on the age group being assessed. | |
Related Measures | Supplement to HOME for Impoverished Families (SHIF) | |
Burden | Training needed to administer | Extensive staff training, supervision, and double ratings required to properly administer this measure. |
Minutes to complete | 60 | |
# of items | Varies based on age group version. Toddler HOME = 45 items, Early Childhood HOME = 55 items. | |
Cost | Yes. $30-50 for manuals, $15-25 for 50 forms. | |
Adaptation for AIAN use | Adapted | No |
Developer allows adaptation? | Contact developer. | |
Used with AIAN populations? | Yes | |
Psychometrics | Norm-referenced | No |
AIAN: Cronbach's alpha range | Mullany et al. (2012) report Cronbach's alpha = 0.74 | |
AIAN: Evidence of validity | Inter-rater agreement >90%; Test-retest reliability appears moderate to low (but challenging because age appropriateness of questions changes as child ages). Reported by Johns Hopkins University Center for American Indian Health | |
Other populations: Cronbach's alpha range | Interrater reliability does not fall below .80, and typically agreement is 90%. Internal consistency of the total scores was as high as .80 and of the subscales ranges from low to strong (.30-.89). Test-retest reliability is moderate over 18 months. Split-half reliability for the total scale was .93 and for the subscales ranges from .53 to .83 (reviewed by Totsika & Sylva, 2004). | |
Other populations: Evidence of validity | HOME scores, especially those obtained after 2 years, relate in expected ways to child cognitive development. The HOME also is moderately related to socio-economic status. Sensitivity and responsiveness, measured by the HOME, relates to child attachment security (reviewed by Totsika & Sylva, 2004). | |
Source | Developer | Bettye M. Caldwell & Robert H. Bradley. |
Link | To order materials, contact Lorriane Coulson, lrcoulson@ualr.edu, H.O.M.E Inventory LLC, Distribution Center or Robert H. Bradley, rbradle2@exchange.asu.edu. | |
Summary | Comments about sensitivity to change | The HOME demonstrates sensitivity to change. Experimental studies show improvements in the HOME among families who were in the intervention groups (Totsika & Sylva, 2004). |
General remarks | There is also a Supplement to the HOME for Impoverished Famlies (SHIF) that contains 20 items that are specific to low-income homes. This should be used with the total HOME inventory, not separately. The HOME is widely used in home visiting studies; appropriateness and relevance of some items were questionable in our populations. Difficult to train local staff to rate objectively. |
Table Updated October 17, 2017